When the Doctor Says Those Words: The Mental Rollercoaster Nobody Warns You About

Related Resources:

• Workplace Abuse Training
• Leadership Skills for Supervisors

Here's something they don't teach you in business school: how to function as a leader when your GP drops a medical bombshell on you during your lunch break. I've been consulting in workplace wellness for seventeen years, and I reckon about 40% of management performance issues stem from undiagnosed health anxiety or the psychological aftermath of medical diagnoses.

Last month, I had a client - brilliant operations manager, runs three manufacturing sites across Queensland - who started making completely irrational decisions after her doctor mentioned "irregularities" in some routine blood work. Suddenly, this woman who could negotiate million-dollar contracts was paralysed by choosing between two perfectly reasonable suppliers.

The thing is, we talk about mental health in the workplace like it's this separate entity. Like you can compartmentalise the fear of cancer or the reality of diabetes into neat little boxes that don't interfere with quarterly reports.

Absolute rubbish.

The Professional Façade Fallacy

Here's my controversial take: the "leave your problems at home" mentality is not just outdated - it's harmful. When someone receives a serious medical diagnosis, their brain literally rewires itself around threat detection. You can't just switch that off because you've walked through the office door.

I remember working with a finance director in Melbourne who'd just been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. For weeks, he was making calculation errors that would've embarrassed a first-year accounting student. His team started questioning his competence. The bloke was brilliant - he just couldn't concentrate because his mind was constantly running disaster scenarios about wheelchairs and dependency.

Instead of addressing it head-on, everyone danced around the elephant in the room. Classic Australian approach, really. "She'll be right, mate." Except she wasn't right, and pretending otherwise nearly cost him his career.

The research backs this up, though the numbers vary depending on who's asking. Studies suggest that people facing serious health issues experience a 60-80% increase in workplace errors during the first three months post-diagnosis. Yet most organisations have zero protocols for supporting employees through medical crises.

The Ripple Effect Nobody Discusses

What really gets me is how we underestimate the cascade effect. A medical diagnosis doesn't just impact the person receiving it - it creates concentric circles of psychological disruption throughout the workplace.

Take financial stress. Nobody wants to admit it, but the first thing most people think about after "Am I going to die?" is "How am I going to pay for this?" Private health insurance in Australia is decent, but it's not magic. Suddenly, that mid-level manager is wondering if they can afford to take sick leave, whether their job will still exist if they need ongoing treatment, and how their family will cope financially.

I've seen department heads become micromanagers overnight because they're terrified of losing control of anything else in their lives. Conversely, I've watched others become completely disengaged because "what's the point of stressing about budget overruns when I might be dead in five years?"

Both responses are completely understandable. Both are also terrible for team morale and productivity.

The Leadership Challenge

Here's where it gets tricky for managers and HR departments. You can't force someone to disclose a medical condition, nor should you. But you also can't ignore significant changes in performance or behaviour and hope they'll sort themselves out.

The key is creating an environment where employee supervision includes genuine psychological safety. Not the buzzword version that gets thrown around in corporate seminars, but actual safety where people feel they can be vulnerable without career consequences.

I worked with a construction company in Perth where the site manager developed heart problems. Instead of hiding it, he was upfront with his crew. The team rallied around him, took on additional responsibilities during his recovery periods, and the project actually finished ahead of schedule. Compare that to another site where the manager tried to hide his diagnosis and ended up making dangerous decisions that nearly resulted in serious injuries.

The difference? Company culture. The first organisation had spent years building trust and psychological safety. The second was still operating on the "tough it out" mentality that's slowly killing Australian workplaces.

Practical Strategies That Actually Work

First, acknowledge that medical diagnoses create grief responses. People grieve their old life, their assumptions about their future, their sense of invincibility. Elizabeth Kübler-Ross wasn't just talking about terminal illnesses - any significant health diagnosis triggers similar psychological stages.

Smart managers recognise these stages and adjust their expectations accordingly. During the denial phase, employees might throw themselves into work with manic intensity. During anger, they might become hypercritical of colleagues or processes. During bargaining, they might make unrealistic commitments about timelines or workload.

Depression is the phase that trips up most workplaces. Suddenly, your star performer is turning in mediocre work and seems disengaged. Without context, it looks like a performance issue. With context, it's a natural psychological response that requires support, not discipline.

I've found that flexible work arrangements during this period aren't just compassionate - they're economically smart. Allowing someone to work from home during chemotherapy treatments, for instance, maintains their productivity while acknowledging their physical limitations. It also demonstrates trust, which strengthens loyalty long-term.

The Australian Context

We've got this weird cultural thing in Australia where admitting vulnerability is somehow seen as weakness. Drives me mental. I've worked across three continents, and nowhere else have I seen such resistance to acknowledging human frailty in professional settings.

Part of it stems from our frontier mentality - the idea that real Australians just get on with it regardless of circumstances. That attitude served our great-grandparents well when they were building railways and fighting bushfires with basic equipment. It's less helpful when dealing with complex medical conditions that require ongoing management and emotional processing.

I remember facilitating a workplace safety workshop where a participant shared that he'd been hiding his diabetes for two years because he was afraid it would impact his career progression. Two years! Meanwhile, his blood sugar fluctuations were affecting his decision-making and his relationships with colleagues thought he was becoming unreliable.

The irony is that most Australian workplaces are far more accommodating than people expect, especially larger organisations with proper HR departments. The fear of disclosure often outweighs the reality of consequences.

The Manager's Dilemma

For managers, the challenge is walking the line between being supportive and being intrusive. You can't demand medical details, but you can observe changes in performance and address them constructively.

I always recommend focusing on behaviours and outcomes rather than assumed causes. Instead of "I know you're dealing with health issues," try "I've noticed some changes in your work patterns lately. How can I support you better?" It opens the door without forcing disclosure.

The best managers I've worked with create multiple pathways for support. Some employees prefer informal conversations, others want formal accommodation processes. Some need flexible schedules, others need reduced responsibilities temporarily. There's no one-size-fits-all solution.

What doesn't work is ignoring the situation and hoping it resolves itself. I've seen too many talented people leave organisations simply because they felt unsupported during health crises. The recruitment and training costs alone make this approach economically questionable, never mind the human cost.

The Technology Factor

Here's something that's changed dramatically in recent years: access to medical information. Twenty years ago, if your doctor said you had condition X, you might look it up in a medical encyclopedia if you were particularly motivated. Now, people receive a diagnosis and immediately dive into online forums, medical journals, and worst-case scenario YouTube videos.

This creates a unique psychological challenge. Instead of processing one piece of information (the diagnosis), people are now processing thousands of pieces of information, much of it contradictory or irrelevant to their specific situation.

I've watched employees become completely paralysed by information overload after a medical diagnosis. They've read every possible complication, every potential treatment side effect, every statistic about long-term outcomes. By the time they're supposed to be making treatment decisions, they're in full analysis paralysis mode.

Smart workplaces acknowledge this reality. Some organisations now include "information literacy" components in their employee assistance programs, helping people navigate medical information without becoming overwhelmed by it.

The Long Game

Here's what I've learned after nearly two decades in this field: organisations that handle medical crises well don't just retain employees - they create fierce loyalty. People remember who supported them during their darkest moments, and they remember who made their difficult situations worse through inflexibility or insensitivity.

The companies that get this right understand that supporting employees through health challenges isn't just about compliance or risk management. It's about recognising that businesses are fundamentally human enterprises, and human beings occasionally face circumstances beyond their control.

I'm not suggesting every workplace needs to become a therapy centre or that managers should double as counsellors. What I am suggesting is that acknowledging the psychological impact of medical diagnoses, creating flexible support systems, and maintaining open communication channels isn't just good human resource management - it's good business.

The alternative is losing valuable employees, dealing with decreased productivity, and creating workplace cultures where people feel they need to choose between their health and their career. In 2025, that's not just bad practice - it's completely unnecessary.

---

Further Reading: Check out our thoughts on managing stress and explore more employee wellbeing resources.